|
|
|
Eso es lo que hay que tener para atreverse a denunciar la verdad sobre el
trato de favor en forma de sentencias blandas que están recibiendo las mujeres que matan a algún miembro de su familia. Este diario de las Islas Baleares ha recogido 10 casos de muertes violentas recientes ocurridas en las islas y las correspondientes condenas dictadas por la Audiencia Provincial de Palma, 5 son hombres y 5 son mujeres, el diario no comenta nada, se limita a exponerlo para que el lector saque sus conclusiones. Un medio de comunicación tiene que tener mucho valor para atreverse a desvelar la verdad en medio del ambiente feminista que está presente en todas partes. Diez casos de muertes violentas ocurridos en la Isla tienen distintas condenas En este reportaje nos hemos limitado a publicar diez sentencias dictadas en la Audiencia Provincial de Palma PEP MATAS ¿Somos iguales ante la ley? o, por qué no preguntárselo, ante la justicia. En este reportaje nos hemos limitado a publicar diez sentencias dictadas en la Audiencia Provincial de Palma. Cinco condenas son para hombres y otras tantas para mujeres, aunque tampoco se trata de centrar exclusivamente entre ambo sexos las posibles diferencias y la relación entre el hecho y el castigo. Todos los casos son o han sido muy conocidos y comentados en todos los estratos de nuestra sociedad. Está claro que cada uno es distinto a la hora de ser juzgado. Ahí queda la pregunta. Peter Oyntzen. El asesino de sa Coma Delito: Mató a sus dos hijos. Condena: Treinta y cuatro años. Situación actual: Se encuentra cumpliendo la condena en el centro penitenciario de Palma. Yasser Ahmed. El parricida de Palma Delito: Mató a su padre. Condena: Ocho años. Situación actual: Se encuentra cumpliendo la condena en el centro penitenciario de Palma. Miguel Orbe.El asesino que no mató a nadie Delito: Quiso matar a su ex mujer. Condena: Más de doce años. Situación actual: Se encuentra cumpliendo la condena en el establecimiento penitenciario de El Dueso (Santander). Diego Mas Howard aka Diego Mas Marques. El homicida de Son Caliu Delito: Mató a Tatiana Vassic. Condena: Quince años. Situación actual: Se encuentra cumpliendo la condena en el centro penitenciario de Palma. José García. El asesino de Manacor Delito: Asesinó a tiros a su compañera. Condena: Dieciseis años y medio. Situación actual: Se encuentra cumpliendo la condena en el centro penitenciario de Palma. Mónica Krieger La parricida de Portocolom Delito: Mató a sus dos hijos. Condena: Estar en un Psiquiátrico. Situación actual: pocos años después de los hechos se fue del Psiquiátrico de Palma y ahora vive en la Península con un hombre y ha tenido otro hijo. Belén Gil La parricida de Calviá Delito: Mató a su padre. Condena: Seis años y un día. Situación actual: Fue asesinada por Bartolomé Clar Camacho en un permiso de salida de la cárcel por las fiestas de Navidad que ambos obtuvieron. Sandra Weber La homicida de Cala Millor Delito: Quiso matar a su marido Condena: Absuelta. Situación actual:Vive en Alemania. Su marido asistió al juicio que se celebró en Palma y dijo que le perdonaba. Ambos vinieron a la Isla en viaje de vacaciones. Catalina Juan. La homicida de Illetes Delito:Mató a su ex marido. Condena:Cinco años. Situación actual:Ingresó hace tres años en la cárcel de Palma y en la actualidad está en situación de Tercer Grado, por lo que sólo tiene que ir al centro a dormir. Paula Varela La homicida de Can Tápara Delito:Mató a su novio. Condena:Siete años. Situación actual:Está ingresada en la cárcel de Palma desde que ocurrieron los hechos, en septiembre de 1999. Esta semana se ha conocido la sentencia. Somos un grupo de personas que estamos organizando una Plataforma para luchar contra la discriminación de los Hombres en todos los ámbitos, para tener fuerza es necesario que seamos muchos, si quieres unirte a esta Plataforma en favor de los derechos de los Hombres suscríbete a la lista de correo que encontrarás en no es necesario que aportes ningún dato personal, tan sólo la dirección de correo que quieras suscribir. Esta lista es el punto de encuentro que dará origen a la futura asociación. Par más información: deliriu...@my-deja.com Eso es lo que hay que tener para atreverse a denunciar la verdad sobre el trato de favor en forma de sentencias blandas que están recibiendo las mujeres que matan a algún miembro de su familia. Este diario de las Islas Baleares ha recogido 10 casos de muertes violentas recientes ocurridas en las islas y las correspondientes condenas dictadas por la Audiencia Provincial de Palma, 5 son hombres y 5 son mujeres, el diario no comenta nada, se limita a exponerlo para que el lector saque sus conclusiones. Un medio de comunicación tiene que tener mucho valor para atreverse a desvelar la verdad en medio del ambiente feminista que está presente en todas partes. Diez casos de muertes violentas ocurridos en la Isla tienen distintas condenas En este reportaje nos hemos limitado a publicar diez sentencias dictadas en la Audiencia Provincial de Palma PEP MATAS ¿Somos iguales ante la ley? o, por qué no preguntárselo, ante la justicia. En este reportaje nos hemos limitado a publicar diez sentencias dictadas en la Audiencia Provincial de Palma. Cinco condenas son para hombres y otras tantas para mujeres, aunque tampoco se trata de centrar exclusivamente entre ambo sexos las posibles diferencias y la relación entre el hecho y el castigo. Todos los casos son o han sido muy conocidos y comentados en todos los estratos de nuestra sociedad. Está claro que cada uno es distinto a la hora de ser juzgado. Ahí queda la pregunta. Peter Oyntzen. El asesino de sa Coma Delito: Mató a sus dos hijos. Condena: Treinta y cuatro años. Situación actual: Se encuentra cumpliendo la condena en el centro penitenciario de Palma. Yasser Ahmed. El parricida de Palma Delito: Mató a su padre. Condena: Ocho años. Situación actual: Se encuentra cumpliendo la condena en el centro penitenciario de Palma. Miguel Orbe.El asesino que no mató a nadie Delito: Quiso matar a su ex mujer. Condena: Más de doce años. Situación actual: Se encuentra cumpliendo la condena en el establecimiento penitenciario de El Dueso (Santander). Diego Mas Howard. El homicida de Son Caliu Delito: Mató a Tatiana Vassic. Condena: Quince años. Situación actual: Se encuentra cumpliendo la condena en el centro penitenciario de Palma. José García. El asesino de Manacor Delito: Asesinó a tiros a su compañera. Condena: Dieciseis años y medio. Situación actual: Se encuentra cumpliendo la condena en el centro penitenciario de Palma. Mónica Krieger La parricida de Portocolom Delito: Mató a sus dos hijos. Condena: Estar en un Psiquiátrico. Situación actual: pocos años después de los hechos se fue del Psiquiátrico de Palma y ahora vive en la Península con un hombre y ha tenido otro hijo. Belén Gil La parricida de Calviá Delito: Mató a su padre. Condena: Seis años y un día. Situación actual: Fue asesinada por Bartolomé Clar Camacho en un permiso de salida de la cárcel por las fiestas de Navidad que ambos obtuvieron. Sandra Weber La homicida de Cala Millor Delito: Quiso matar a su marido Condena: Absuelta. Situación actual:Vive en Alemania. Su marido asistió al juicio que se celebró en Palma y dijo que le perdonaba. Ambos vinieron a la Isla en viaje de vacaciones. Catalina Juan. La homicida de Illetes Delito:Mató a su ex marido. Condena:Cinco años. Situación actual:Ingresó hace tres años en la cárcel de Palma y en la actualidad está en situación de Tercer Grado, por lo que sólo tiene que ir al centro a dormir. Paula Varela La homicida de Can Tápara Delito:Mató a su novio. Condena:Siete años. Situación actual:Está ingresada en la cárcel de Palma desde que ocurrieron los hechos, en septiembre de 1999. Esta semana se ha conocido la sentencia. Somos un grupo de personas que estamos organizando una Plataforma para luchar contra la discriminación de los Hombres en todos los ámbitos, para tener fuerza es necesario que seamos muchos, si quieres unirte a esta Plataforma en favor de los derechos de los Hombres suscríbete a la lista de correo que encontrarás en no es necesario que aportes ningún dato personal, tan sólo la dirección de correo que quieras suscribir. Esta lista es el punto de encuentro que dará origen a la futura asociación. Par más información: deliriu...@my-deja.com That's what you need to have to dare to report the truth about the preferential treatment in the form of soft sentences are receiving women who kill any member of your family. This newspaper of the Balearic Islands has collected 10 cases of violent deaths Recent that occurred on the islands and corresponding sentences by the Provincial Court of Palma, five are men and 5 are women, newspaper says nothing, merely to expose the reader to draw his conclusions. A media must have a lot of courage to dare reveal the truth in the midst of the feminist environment that is present in everywhere. Ten cases of violent deaths that occurred on the island have different convictions In this report we have limited ourselves to publish ten judgments the Provincial Court of Palma PEP MATAS Are we equal before the law? or, why not ask, to justice. In this report we have limited ourselves to publish ten judgments the Provincial Court of Palma. Five convictions are for men and others many women, but neither is focusing solely between both sexes potential differences and the relationship between fact and punishment. All cases are or have been well known and discussed in all strata of our society. It is clear that each is different from the time trial. That is the question. Peter Oyntzen. The murderer of sa Coma Crime: He killed his two sons. Sentence: Thirty-four years. Situation Current: he is serving the sentence in the penitentiary Palm. Yasser Ahmed. The parricide in Palma Crime: He killed his father. Sentence: Eight years. Current status: Found serving his sentence in the prison of Palma. Miguel Orbe.El murderer did not kill anyone Crime: I wanted to kill his ex-wife. Sentence: More than twelve years. Situation Current: he is serving the sentence in the establishment prison of Dueso (Santander). Diego Mas Howard aka Diego Mas Marques. The murder of Son Caliu Crime: He killed Tatiana Vassic. Sentence: Fifteen years. Current status: serving his sentence in the prison of Palma. José García. The murderer of Manacor Crime: shot dead his partner. Sentence: sixteen and a half years. Current situation is serving the sentence in the middle Palma prison. The Mónica Krieger parricida Portocolom Crime: He killed his two sons. Sentence: Being in a psychiatric hospital. Situation Now: a few years after the events went Psychiatric de Palma now he lives in the Peninsula with a man and had another son. The parricide Belén Gil Calvia Crime: He killed his father. Sentence: Six years and one day. Current situation: It was Clar killed by Bartholomew Camacho in an exit permit from prison for Christmas parties both they obtained. The murder of Sandra Weber Cala Millor Crime: He wanted to kill her husband Sentence: acquitted. Current situation: Live in Germany. Her husband attended the trial held in Palma and said he She forgave him. Both came to the island on vacation trip. Catalina Juan. The murder of Illetes Crime: He killed her ex-husband. Sentence: Five years. Current situation: Joined three years ago in Palma prison and now he is in a position Third grade, so just go downtown to sleep. Paula Varela's murder Can Tapara Crime: He killed her boyfriend. Sentence: Seven years. Current situation: It is entered Palma in prison since the events occurred in September 1999. This week has known the sentence. We are a group of people who are organizing a Platform combat discrimination of men in all areas, for have strength we need to be many if you want to join this Platform for the Rights of Men Subscribe to the list mail you'll find do not need to input any personal data, only the address mail you want to subscribe. This list is the meeting point which results in the future association. Par more information: deliriu...@my-deja.com UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) v. ) ) ) Cr. No. 09-10304-MLW DIEGO MASMARQUES, Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WOLF, D.J. September 22, 2015 Defendant Diego MasMarques has filed a Motion to Seal, asking the court to seal the record of this case on the PACER system and to remove the record from the Federal Bureau of Investigation's ("FBI") National Criminal Information Center ("NCIC") database (the "Motion"). The Motion is being denied for the reasons explained below. I. BACKGROUND On July 17, 2000, MasMarques, who is an American citizen, was convicted of two counts of burglary and one count of willful homicide in Spain. The Spanish court sentenced him to one year in prison on the first burglary count, two years in prison on the second burglary count, and twelve years in prison on the homicide count. In 2005, pursuant to a Transfer Treaty, he was transferred to the United States to serve the remainder of his sentence. Prior to his transfer to the United States, MasMarques signed a form consenting to serve the remainder of his sentence Case 1:09-cr-10304-MLW Document 7 Filed 09/22/15 Page 1 of 7 2 according to the laws of the United States. By signing the form, he agreed that his "conviction or sentence can only be modified or set aside through appropriate proceedings brought by me or on my behalf in Spain." See Feb. 13, 2006 Verification of Consent to Transfer (Docket No. 1-4). MasMarques's case was initially assigned to the Eastern District of Wisconsin for performance of the verification proceedings required by 18 U.S.C. §4108. On August 20, 2008, MasMarques was released to a three-year term of supervised release in the Southern District of New York. On June 2, 2009, with the permission of the Probation Office, MasMarques moved to Woburn, Massachusetts. As a result, his case was transferred to this court for supervision during the remainder of his period of supervised release. See 18 U.S.C. §4106A(b)(3). On January 18, 2013, MasMarques, acting pro se, filed a motion requesting that the court seal the record of his conviction in Spain. In addition, he requests that the court remove a negative "alert" that appears in the FBI's NCIC database. He claims that the availability of his criminal record has harmed his ability to find a job. He maintains that allowing this criminal record to be publicly accessible violates his rights under the Double Jeopardy Clause. Case 1:09-cr-10304-MLW Document 7 Filed 09/22/15 Page 2 of 7 3 II. DISCUSSION MasMarques's Motion to Seal presents four issues: (1) whether public availability of his criminal record constitutes a second punishment in violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment; (2) whether the court should seal the record of his conviction; (3) whether the court has authority to order the removal of the negative "alert" based on his case that appears in the FBI's NCIC database; and (4) whether the court has authority to expunge MasMarques's criminal record. MasMarques is proceeding pro se. Therefore, his motion will be construed liberally. See Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007). Nevertheless, there is no legal basis to grant the relief that he requests. Therefore, his Motion is being denied. A. Double Jeopardy The Double Jeopardy Clause "safeguards an individual against (1) a second prosecution for the same offense, following an acquittal; (2) a second prosecution for the same offense, following a conviction; and (3) multiple punishments for the same offense." United States v. Stoller, 78 F.3d 710, 714 (1st Cir. 1996) (quoting United States v. Rivera-Martinez, 931 F.3d 148, 152 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 862 (1991)). "The Clause protects only against the imposition of multiple criminal punishments for the same offense . . . and then only when such Case 1:09-cr-10304-MLW Document 7 Filed 09/22/15 Page 3 of 7 4 occurs in successive proceedings." Hudson v. United States, 522 U.S. 93, 99 (1997) (emphasis in original). In determining whether a government action is "punishment" for purposes of the Double Jeopardy Clause, courts examine the totality of the circumstances to determine whether its objectives or effects are "punitive" in nature. See Stoller, 78 F.3d at 721. The public availability of the records of MasMarques's conviction under the PACER, CORI, and NCIS system is not a "punishment" in violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause. Many courts have recognized that "[t]he dissemination of accurate public record information concerning an individual's past criminal activities holds "the potential for substantial negative consequences." E.B. v. Verniero, 119 F.3d 1077, 1099 (3d Cir. 1997). "Nevertheless, our laws' insistence that information regarding criminal proceedings be publicly disseminated is not intended as punishment and has never been regarded as such." Id. at 1100. The purpose of these systems is "regulatory," and they, therefore, are "not punishment even though it may bear harshly on one affected." Doe v. Pataki, 120 F.3d 1263, 1279 (2d Cir. 1997) (quoting Flemming v. Nestor, 363 U.S. 603, 613 (1960). Furthermore, the negative effects of publicly disseminating criminal records do not "implicate any interest of fundamental constitutional magnitude." See Verniero, 119 F.3d at 1103. Therefore, the availability of the Case 1:09-cr-10304-MLW Document 7 Filed 09/22/15 Page 4 of 7 5 PACER records, the NCIC alerts, and the resulting negative effects do not constitute a second punishment in violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause. B. Sealing MasMarques's Court Records In the United States, there is a common law presumption of public access to judicial records. See Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978); United States v. Kravetz, 706 F.3d 47, 62 (1st Cir. 2013). This presumption "stems from the premise that public monitoring of the judicial system fosters the important values of 'quality, honesty and respect for our legal system.'" Siedle v. Putnam Investments, Inc., 147 F.3d 7, 9-10 (1st Cir. 1998). Furthermore, Congress has recognized a "compelling public need" to keep criminal records publicly available. United States v. Schnitzer, 567 F.2d 536, 539 (2d Cir. 1977). When evaluating a motion to seal a court record, the court "carefully balances the competing interests that are at stake in the particular case." Siedle, 147 F.3d at 10. MasMarques contends that it is unfair to allow the record of his case to be publicly accessible through the court's PACER system because public availability of the record has made it difficult for him to find a job . If courts were to allow the stigma resulting from the public record of a case to outweigh the public right of access, then virtually all criminal records Case 1:09-cr-10304-MLW Document 7 Filed 09/22/15 Page 5 of 7 6 would be sealed. The balance might lean more in MasMarques's favor if he had been acquitted or exonerated of the charges in Spain. See Diamond v. United States, 649 F.2d 496, 499 (7th Cir. 1981). However, the presumptive public right of access to court records is not outweighed solely because the record has an adverse effect on the defendant's livelihood, as such rule would vitiate the presumptive public right of access. Indeed, "courts must be reluctant to substitute their judgment for that of employers, legislators, and others in whom the discretion to give second chances is more properly vested." United States v. Barrow, 06-Cr-1086(JFK), 2014 WL 2011689, at *2. Consequently, the court is denying MasMarques's request to seal the record of this case. C. Removing the "Alert" from the NCIC Database 28 U.S.C. §534 directs the Attorney General to maintain a criminal records database. MasMarques complains that his criminal record is accessible in this database. However, courts are without authority to order removal of a criminal record from the NCIC database. See Carter v. United States, 431 Fed. Appx. 104, 105-06 (3d Cir. 2011); United States v. Lucido, 612 F.3d 871, 875 (6th Cir. 2010). Therefore, the court must deny MasMarques's request. Case 1:09-cr-10304-MLW Document 7 Filed 09/22/15 Page 6 of 7 7 D. Expunging MasMarques's Criminal Record MasMarques also appears to request that the cou rt expunge the American court records of his convictions in Spain. However, federal courts lack subject matter jurisdiction to expunge criminal records based solely on "equitable reasons," meaning "grounds that rely only on notions of fairness and are entirely divorced from legal considerations." United States v. Coloian, 480 F.3d 47, 52 (1st Cir. 2009). MasMarques provides no legal basis to expunge his record. The court does not have jurisdiction to expunge his record on these grounds. See id. III. ORDER In view of the foregoing, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Seal (Docket No. 4) is DENIED. /s/ Mark L. Wolf UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE |
|
|
????????, 17 ?????? 2017 ?. 19:47:58 UTC-4 ?????????? 302igh239pgh ???????:
[..] > record on these grounds. See id. III. ORDER In view of the foregoing, > it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Seal (Docket No. 4) is > DENIED. /s/ Mark L. Wolf UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Jeffrey Allen Steinport is responsible for this Cyber Terrorizing and CyberHarassment. |
|
|
?????? ????????? 17 ??????? 2017 7:47:58 ? UTC-4? ??? 302igh239pgh:
[..] |